Sometimes the more you learn about a tax policy, the more it confuses you. Many times, the confusion lies between the intent of the policymakers and what really happens. Often, it’s when important issues were overlooked when the policy was being designed. Such is the case for U.S. companies that run losses on their domestic operations while earning profits on foreign operations—current cross-border tax rules are increasing future tax bills by reducing the value of loss deductions.
The definition of GILTI includes foreign earnings minus 10 percent of the value of foreign tangible assets (known as Qualified Business Asset Investment or QBAI). The corporate tax rate of 21 percent only applies to GILTI after a 50 percent deduction (known as the Section 250 deduction), which can result in a minimum tax rate of 10.5 percent on foreign earnings. If a company has paid foreign taxes on some of those earnings, the company is only eligible for an 80 percent foreign tax credit. A company that faces that limit on foreign tax credits may face an effective tax rate on GILTI of 13.125 percent.
That simple story for GILTI is not always true for U.S. companies, though. In fact, GILTI throws some major curveballs.
One of those curveballs is the way GILTI treats U.S. multinationals that are running losses on their domestic operations. If a U.S. company is running a loss on its U.S. operations, it is usually able to carry those losses forward to offset future tax liability when it finally turns a profit.
In any given year, the tax value of a loss deduction is calculated as the loss multiplied by the corporate tax rate. At a 21 percent rate, the tax value of a $100 loss is $21. If a company runs a $100 loss in 2020 and uses that loss deduction to offset a $100 profit in 2021, then it has saved $21 in taxes. Loss carryforwards are specifically intended to ensure that companies get taxed on their average profitability over time.
However, if GILTI is in play, then the situation changes. Let’s say our U.S. company that is running a $100 loss on its domestic operations is still turning a profit on its foreign sales. Because most of the world’s consumers are outside the U.S., it is quite possible that sales on foreign activities could be profitable while investment or ramping up hiring in the U.S. could create a loss at home.
If the U.S. company runs a loss of $100 on its U.S. operations, it would usually be able to claim that loss against future tax liability and save $21 in future taxes (assuming a 21 percent corporate tax rate).
However, if that same company has enough profits abroad that it has $300 in earnings subject to GILTI, the situation changes. Instead of being able to claim the full 50 percent Section 250 deduction (which, in this case would be $150), the company is required to use its U.S. losses first before using the Section 250 deduction. The company’s GILTI tax base is reduced to $150 by first applying the $100 domestic loss and then $50 remaining from the Section 250 deduction.
Rather than having the $100 loss to offset future tax liability and the $150 Section 250 deduction against GILTI, the company loses its loss offset and part of the value of its Section 250 deduction. The $21 value of the loss offset has been used up against GILTI, and future tax liability for that company will rise by that same amount.
If domestic losses are large enough to eliminate tax liability on GILTI, then potential foreign tax credit offsets to GILTI are eliminated along with the loss offsets.
Imagine another company with $300 losses on its domestic operations ($63 in tax value at a 21 percent corporate tax rate) and sufficient foreign profits to have $300 in GILTI. If those foreign profits have already faced taxation abroad at 10 percent (and $30 in taxes paid), GILTI foreign tax credit rules mean the company could have up to $24 in foreign tax credits (80 percent of $30 is $24). However, those foreign tax credits are worthless to the company because the $300 in GILTI gets wiped out by the domestic losses. Neither the foreign tax credits, nor the domestic loss deductions, can be used in future years.
This is a problem that is unique to companies with domestic losses and foreign profits. For companies that are profitable on their domestic operations neither the Section 250 deduction nor their foreign tax credits would be reduced or eliminated. The way GILTI is calculated therefore creates an imbalance between companies that are profitable in their domestic operations and those that are not.
Tax laws should be neutral in the way they treat companies at different points in their life cycle. If a company is growing and investing and building up losses while gaining customers worldwide, the tax code should not artificially increase that company’s future tax bills or reduce other deductions that are otherwise fully available to profitable companies.
To address this issue, GILTI calculations should be changed so that companies are not required to use domestic losses to reduce the value of the Section 250 deduction or eliminate the value of foreign tax credits. Domestic losses should be allowed to offset future domestic profits rather than being wrapped up in offsetting liabilities connected to foreign profits.
As lawmakers are reviewing international tax rules and determining what to change and update, they should pay attention to the way GILTI interacts with profitable and loss-making companies.
Was this page helpful to you?
The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?
Share This Article!
Let us know how we can better serve you!
We work hard to make our analysis as useful as possible. Would you consider telling us more about how we can do better?